Monday, September 28, 2015

People you never meet..

..but feel like your true friends.

It could be just a feeling. Maybe you would meet them and don't like them that much anymore. Maybe I could have met a clone of myself and not liking him at first sight.

I remember when I was reading a computer magazine in the 90s and someone complained how people focus more on computers and have no life, then mentioned his co-student who in his own words "had the dare" to say this "Who needs girls? You should focus on your Pascal!" (Turbo Pascal, that old programming language I never used much, but was high during the 90s). I don't know the guy who wrote this letter and even worse so the second dude who he mentions. If there is an opposite of six degrees of separation, here is a guy I never met who mentioned a second guy I never met and I always thought about that second person who I never met, what is he doing now? Where is he? What is his current view? Did he switched 180 degrees into "normality" (most of them can't take the social pressure and they do) or is he still fanatic about coding?

It's not like I want him to be what he was. If he is happier after switching to "normal" then I am fine. But it's so rare that someone says something that is so counterintuitive in the face, has the balls to say it, also reveals a personality I would like to meet, we might have similar problems or wishes. I instantly feel like a friend to this person.

And that's what happens when you meet a girl who is not only into computers but is into coding or demoscene. Or a girl who has a monologue with me and says things I wouldn't expect based on our culture doctrines. And I am like wow, she is like "I know I am crazy, I talk too much without letting you speak" and I am like "No, no, I truly enjoy this, continue!". Or that girl which was looking quite autistic and was bullied at school. Where is she now?

And the lesson here is not whether being "normal" is good or bad, whether focusing on special activities or seeking for your soulmate is better for you. I don't want to have an opinion on this, actually it doesn't make sense since for some people the opposite than "normal" makes sense (and people will disagree, because it's supposed to be by cultural standards that everyone wants the girls at the end, even if he codes). I just want to focus on how sometimes an unknown person who expresses ideas that are unpopular and happen to match your own revolving ideas suddenly feel like he has more common with you than the persons you meet everyday.

I was reading into a different philosophy in psychology from an author called David Smail. His ideas are counterintuitive to the regular methods of psychology about how we are trying to help/fix patients with common assumptions and if our methods fail, it's their fault, they didn't try enough. He has the view that we always blame the patients but never the environment, which seems very counterintuitive to what we as a culture believe, because you'd rather believe everyone has his own responsibility rather than it's the environment that's faulty. Nevertheless, there are some more ideas which I learned.

The primary idea is that "Absolutely everyone wants to be liked".And yes, I am reading this from the wiki page about him, not sure I read about this idea much in one of his older books. But it stayed on me because at first it was the only idea I couldn't figure out (Yeah, another new-ageish sounding like the universe is love, or everyone wants to be liked). But it makes totally sense about our psychology and the forces that drive us. It's both what motivates us and what makes us crash at the end. I am content with how everything is explained in my mind with this idea. And I think it's like a double edged sword, the bringer of happiness and despair in human lives.

When someone tells me the cliche "Hey, you all do that for the chicks. Even democoding, psychologically you are doing it for the chicks. Every creative thing happens to secretly (unconsciously) impress the girls, even though you know you would just look more geeky and unsexy to them". I'd like to add something else in the equation, it's not the girls, it's the need to be liked, to be accepted, for people to notice you. It makes more sense that even creative hobbies are happening for this. Of course you also end up liking the hobby yourself and acquire some useful skills, or get positive feedback about how proficient you have become with it (although that's like unconsciously telling to yourself, hey look how good I become every other day, I am wondering how adorable people will think I am when they see me coding like this). The girls are not the end (Then, what is the end for the girls themselves, the guys? What about people who cannot hook anymore?). The girls is just another means to feel significant, to feel like people like you. If you know that someone of the other sex loves you, then you elevate your feeling from that of the average loner to someone for whom another beautiful existence cares, thus making you believe you are special and so more likeable. Love is another way to feel like you are very likeable and not a common Joe who nobody cares about.

I would like to write about these things in another post, since I diverted. But here is where I am going with it. There was a specific text in the first book I am reading "Illusion and Reality" that hit me. He said something along the lines that you don't have enough mental energy to go against the cultural core beliefs. Maybe it isn't exactly what he said but what I understood out of it. He said that no matter how strong you think you are, it's very hard, almost impossible to believe in some ideas that are contrary or taboo compared to the common beliefs and strongly feel confident about these ideas. I would digress at first, I would say "No, there are strong thinkers that went against the established status quo!". But it's the idea that matters here. This is all because we want to be liked! Most of us are afraid to say something unpopular because we feel we will be frowned upon. Some of us do, we fill strong at the time, but then this is what happens. We have our doubts. Anyone can come and debunk any idea anyway. Especially in the subjective realm of human experience. But if 99% or even 30% of the population believes specific ideas and talks about them, then you have a lot of "friends" to hold upon, feeling that you are not just the only "crazy" who believes that, but many feel like this.

But what if your idea was very unpopular? Certainly there might be few people in the world who believe your idea but they are very much rare. So, suddenly you glimpse someone saying something totally counterintuitive like "Forget about girls, Pascal is the future!" and you think "Wow, I wanna meet this guy!". And it's not like I think Pascal is the future or I don't care about girls. But that guy farted in the face of "normality"! That guy said something so against the regular notion of "normality" as taken from granted by our modern culture, that I suddenly felt less alone. I felt that there was another guy struggling with all these ideas about not being normal and about our programming hobby being frowned upon at the times, which isn't much anymore since everyone is onto computers, everyone thinks he is a geek, even if very few still code, but at the time when you felt alone and there was no internet and everyone told you to get a life and nobody understood what you did, that was a glimpse of happiness that somewhere there is another person who believes what you believe. Isn't that what makes a friend? The "Other me" as some greek philosopher put it (I don't remember where I read this). Of course, it's not that I want all my friends to be like me, most of them are quite different in many aspects, I only want to preserve this magical idea of someone feeling truly alone even among people he knows because his views on life are "invalid" to the common sense of his era, then suddenly another unknown person supports his views of life and he doesn't feel lonely anymore for a glimpse.

As a final example, imagine if you were gay in the 50s. You would struggle with the idea and everybody would frown upon. You wouldn't even mention it, maybe even "agree" to people who were against it, in order to hide it. At that era, everyone who would say bad things about gays would be tapped in the back in the friendly manner, he would feel connected and not lonely, because he agrees with the majority. But imagine what would happen today if you where against gays. You would be frowned upon totally, and you would be a loner in your opinions, knowing that everywhere you talk about your beliefs, nobody will take you seriously and even if someone believed something similar, he would keep silently in fear of others. And then you found another person supporting these unpopular ideas (which changed 180 degrees from the past to the present) and you don't feel alone. Suddenly you feel slightly more confident about your ideas because you are not the only one supporting them.

Btw,. I am not against gay, I am just siting the first example that comes into mind. To be honest, I don't care about gays, they don't make me sad or happy and I can hapily live with them among us in society, and I believe many people who are today pro-gay, they really are "Look at me, I am a progressive thinker!" or "I don't want you to think I am against gays, so that I must claim I am not, but I don't really care at the end, I only care that people doesn't misunderstand me (dislike me)" , because today you must be progressive so that people will like you, but in the past you could be against gays and most people would like you too. We are all doing it for the likes, and the only people who care are gays themselves who struggled with this. In the 50s a more conservative mind would be adored, nowadays you must be leftist or something to be liked, and sometimes people want to be considered openminded but then they are closeminded with other matters, when not many people support these other matters. We are doing it for the likes, not because we really believe. Unless we have a special reason to believe in the unpopular, like when we struggle with issues ourselves that are currently frowned upon but we can't help it, like being introverted or autistic or overly sensitive or fat or asexual or whatever. Just think about it!

I think I diverted, but look how the liking theory goes into that stuff. Behind all the "look I am progressive" or "I care about you" or "The universe is love" or whatever rocks your boat, there is this primary human need to be liked, to be accepted in the community, to be special. It's not love or sex! Those are subparts of this need. And this need is like a double edged sword, because sometimes we are needy of it, we are jealous, we fight with each other, we are like "Look at me, why don't you look at me?" and we are desperate with life because of it. At least that's my current view now, maybe many people feel different about what drives us and I am ok. But I think this realization helped me understand more about myself and the world. It's even like a meditation exercise where you have to be more aware of this force and look beyond it. And it explains a lot about everything.

It also explains how you feel more friends with people who share similar unpopular ideas as you but you have never met them.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

Some things about weight loss I learned so far.

Some of them will be like quotes and small explanations, something to focus your thinking into, mantras. Let's get over with these first.

  • What is weight loss? It sounds naturally good because it's all about what you do to go from the obese/overweight state to natural. But it's not natural to your body. Your body will resist to the weight loss. We are not meant to lose weight as we weren't meant to gain it in the first place. I guess, you need unnatural means to correct the unnatural causes that brought you here in the first place. So, merely eating healthy food might not always work. That would be the thing you should have done in order to not reach the unhealthy state you are now. So, you may need to do a little more, something which will make your body scream "unnatural". Or is it?
  • Health freaks and gym goers are not the first people you should listen to if you are obese. Many people would say that these guys are the good examples, so they might know better. Many of them never had a tendency for metabolic syndrome, diabetes 2. Also, they are health freaks. Their personality says "My body is the most important thing and I want to show it off!". Your personality might say "Mind over body" or "Gym is boring like hell". Better seek for obese/diabetic people who somehow managed to get over their condition.

Some of the facts I learned, some are untested or I am not sure about, some I believe and make sense, some I want to research more.

  • High fat/low carb is the most trendy diet/eating philosophy nowadays. I do generally believe in it because there are a lot of scientific papers showing better diet success rates than traditional low fat/high carb diets. Could I test it truly? I never did fully low carb (like 20g or less) because I found this excessive. Even if I avoid the many carb/sugar foods and do fat-centric diet, it didn't seemed to work much. Maybe I didn't stick to it or eat some more hidden carbs? I became a maniac of reading labels about carbs and preferring fat and protein though. I am still doing it sometimes. My diet is fat-centric but not so carb restricting. And yet I always went yo-yo no matter if it was traditional diet or fat-centric diet.
  • They say that if you eat carb foods like for example bread, prefer high fibre stuff. The logic behind it is that fibre slows down the sudden increase of insulin or sugar levels from carb eating. I can't test this but many doctors say that and I believe it. Preferring fibre foods during my fat-centric diet was fine (My taste is fine with black bread) but still didn't produce miracles in my diet, still yo-yo.
  • There is also protein in salads and chicken or fish. Something I learned recently is that even protein can rise your insulin levels enough. Even fat minimally rises insulin. Protein may rise half the level than carbs, which are the worse offenders. Which makes sense, in fact we need insulin to convert food into energy, so why is this bad. Because there is a catch with diabetics type 2 (also you might not be officially diabetic yet, but start developing metabolic syndrome which might lead there if you don't learn to control your insulin with what you eat naturally).
  • Insulin is not bad. It's the hormone that naturally rises when you eat food, so that it can help in the production of energy from it. But there is a developed problem in people with diabetes type 2 called insulin resistance. It means that insulin has a bad time converting the food you are sending into energy, thus driving away more of the glucose that accumulates as fat, while still producing more insulin than the body needs. It's a vicious cycle. The result is high blood sugar but one should think of it as the after-effect of the problem. The real culprit is the high produce of insulin.
  • That's where fasting comes in. There is this theory (I will post video links at the end) from few doctors that in order to treat the diabetes you have to lower your insulin by letting it dive down during a bigger fasting window. 12-14 hours can still be considered "fasting", so if you don't want to go extreme at first, you can try to not eat anything after 6pm so it's 14 hours till breakfast at 8am in the morning. Alternatively, some days you can try to skip breakfast (I know that some of these are considered big no-no's by conventional dieting, but why not try something alternative if nothing worked for you before?). At more advanced levels you can try 20-24 hours fasting. Or maybe if you had a day with friend where everyone ordered a big pizza, just think that you just ate more than 2000 calories (I checked the numbers on the internet for large Domino pizza) so even if your body says it's hungry in the morning, just visualize that and try to keep the fuck you (that's a phrase I tell to myself, originally from Pouet :)
  • Maybe my persistence kept me focused on this finally (while I failed to stick to any other diet after 2 weeks) but also the very relevant science to my diabetes type 2 case might fit and helped see results so far, both in my lower blood sugar levels and steady 0.5kg per week weight loss for about 7 weeks so far. And I am happy with it. The only peculiar thing is that my fat-counter doesn't show any drop in my fat levels for all this period, something that worries me a bit (Could it be liquids or muscle loss? Usually liquids is when you suddenly loose 1-2kg in 2-3 days that doesn't make sense, while here the loss is steady and gradual, so maybe it could be muscle loss or maybe my fat-counter is not accurate. But as I have big success with blood sugar and confidence in this diet, I will keep on and see)
  • Also, if you have a big feast in the evening (like our pizza nights) and the insulin raises fast, somehow the next day you might feel hungry. And I've heard this is not a proper hunger signal. Since you are aware you had the 2400 calories meal, you know what you have to do. Fast for a big period of time and ignore this hunger. There is although another kind of hunger I found out, when there is a daily calorie restriction (traditional diets) and you start having headaches. Maybe that's a sign that you are eating less than you should. I don't get these much in a fasting diet.
  • Someone would argue, isn't then fasting a calorie restriction diet? And I would argue too because I sometimes am confused. But in the same videos I'll post link about, I read about some studies of conventional restricting diets (like everyday the same amount of 1600 cals for example) after a while don't work well, since the body knows that you give it less energy for every day passing, then it drops the metabolic rate thus making you very tired, burning less, also trapping you into gaining weight at the end if you are fed up with it and eat a bigger meal next day. I know about this, I have been there, counting calories, eating about 1600 cals and even trying to do it with every day salads and some chicken, healthy stuff. Sometimes, I felt like I had less success with these restricting diets than the days where I was fed up with diets and eat normally. The difference with fasting diet is that it comes into cycles of eating normally and then restricting the eating window (not necessary the calories) the next day. I mean, normally a 5:2 fad diet tells you to eat normally at 5 days and then eat 600 cals in 2 other days. I haven't even gone there and still have success! I did my 24 hours fasting after I eat a big fast food meal ffs! Then be careful to not overeat later. And sometimes just skipped breakfast randomly. But no controls or awareness of calories except of visualizing of my head what I ate today to know if I accidentally overeat. It's still unplanned and it works, just because of creating some smaller eating windows!

So, there has to be something about it in my own case. And maybe obese or diabetic people or people with evolving metabolic syndrome who are currently overweight but it might get worse. It's good to know and consider learning more if you are into that category.

Now, random facts about psychology:

  • Rule number 1, your whole weight loss attempts are very much entangled to your personality and emotions about it. You can be very demotivated if your ego tells you "I must do this. I must prove them that I am not a fat idiot. If I fail, I must prove I am not lazy!" and that hurts you and makes you quit and/or overeat. A friend told me that I should see the weight loss diet as a game, but I digressed because if I saw it as a game I wouldn't take it seriously and then fail. Meanwhile, diets are not my thing and I love food and I still believe it's natural to love food. Anyway, one day when I decided to try the fasting diet, since it was my n-th attempt, I kinda had this not-caring attitude like saying to myself " Just do it so that you try another thing. Don't expect results immediately. And even if you fail, you tried another experiment. Afterall it seems more enjoyful to eat normally, then test yourself by skipping a meal, then eat again rather than traditional calorie restriction diets. Or allowing yourself to eat something big so that you fast for 24 hours.". And thus I took it non-seriously.
  • Rule number 2, because of your seriousness and your ego hurt, you get angry about every random thing you hear. And nowadays everyone is a "health expert" and "diet specialist", everyone has strong opinions and there are even confusing pro-vegan VS traditional diet VS low-carb VS other nutrional dogmas. You might read about something that tells you not to eat your favorite food and thus you are doing it wrong, you might discuss it on youtube or a message board and someone is gonna tell you that you are wrong or even worse that it's all about calories in-calories out and how fat ass lazy you are. You might even engage in such discussions and lose a day and not feel good later on. I've done it and I do it. But it's all bullshit. At least I feel like this because now I've found my way, so I can just ignore them. And that's the hardest part, I can only say that I don't respond anymore because I think I solved it with fasting, so no more need to feel bad with my failures anymore. But few months ago when I was beating myself about this, I would read a comment at youtube about lazy fat obese people and it would drive me mad (it still does, with their insensitivity, but now I can prove them whatever I want).
  • So again, what are the motivation forces here? First you need the initial start. You already had some initial starts. That moment/day when you say "This is it! I am starting from today with this new diet plan and I will win this time!". We all had these. And the problem is that when another attempt fails (after 2 weeks or you get bored after a month) you decide to forget about it for few more months. So there are very few "motivation spike windows" where you can retry something different that might work this time. I think now, that this has to sync with a better strategic diet that somehow is more easy to follow and leads to more predictable results, giving you the feeling that you can finally control your weight or sugar level or fat percentage, any of these, and this will lead yourself to believe in this new attempt/maybe the new diet strategy, creating a positive motivation/feedback loop that gives you courage to continue for more weeks. This is what happened to me with the fasting strategy (and I wasn't even doing a precise diet then, I was almost randomly fasting and not fasting, depending on how I feel the particular day, testing myself). One thing to be careful off. Maybe what you are attempting is a good thing, but you need to try it for at least 3-4 weeks to be sure. And that's the hard part, to not stop after 2 weeks. Basically, I think I had some results even in the first 2 weeks, I even had a bump in the 3rd week, but then I thought that maybe for 1-2 weeks it's a false alarm, so if I don't see what happens for after 4 weeks I can't start believing it much, which I do, which feeds the positive motivation/feedback cycle.

Random last things I don't know about:

  • I am not really sure at the end if carb-centric or fat-centric or caloric restriction or full vegan is better for you. I sort of tried every one of them through the years, maybe some will accuse me I wasn't precise in my attempts, maybe I ate more carbs or I cheated on counting the calories, etc, etc. According to their healthy eating religion of course, if your results deny their philosophy on this, they will think your data is wrong. But if it's supporting their beliefs they won't even question my results. My new fasting attempt also suffers from not precise planning, not strictly counting what I eat, and making a lot of no-no decision and eating fast food during 1/3rd of the full fasting Saturdays. I had made a lot of mistakes (like eating the candy in the office the way I used to overeat such treats before even starting) but of course also some good choices and slight policing but not obsessively, and definitely my eating is still very random with only some fasting strategy for few of the days. So, my new attempt is as sloppy and unscientific than all my old attempts in different schools of thought. And it fucking works even in this form! That surprises me. When one of the old attempts failed, I was telling to myself "Maybe you ate more calories than you counted" or "Most probably even restricting to 50gr of carbs is not enough and you have to do the 0-20gr people propose" or "Maybe you also need to hit the gym at the same time" (which I did, even during my many salads and some protein meat plus calorie counting days). Now I don't even visit the gym and I am the same sloppy as all these other diet strategies, but it shows promise! 
  • Although I want to make an experiment now that I have control. My fasting strategy is currently close to my last habits, more fat-centric. What if one or two of my next weeks where carb-centric fasting weeks. Or vegan-centric fasting weeks. Or even fastfood-centric fasting weeks. How would that affect? Would the carb-centric somehow help me lose the fat which is the only thing stuck? Would it reverse the diet and suddenly carb-centric fasting techniques will make me not lose weight or even gain? Or would it make me lose weight faster? How about the other ones? A week of fast-food everyday might be bad for health regardless success (I will wait to drop a lot of weight before I try this one, just to not destroy what I have gained so far) but I want to see as an experiment how the same fasting strategy (which clearly controls my weight/sugar well) will change things. I could have done such experiments without fasting, one would say, but technically I might have done them in traditional ways, but couldn't clearly notice changes, only yo-yo dieting (and calorie restriction was the worse, dropping my metabolism, not loosing weight and being pissed about and then gaining it). It always seemed random to me, nothing made sense. But since I now have some initial conditions (fasting with fat-centric) with clear observable non-random results and I can make some conclusions, what if I tried in the same framework the other schools of thought? Maybe what I find says some things about me, maybe it's not the truth for everyone and every diet works different for each person. But the framework is also something I can follow so that I don't think my experiment didn't worked because I failed to follow.
  • I really don't about gym. I do walk sometimes. I don't feel like running or going to the gym and it's hard to do it if you don't like it. I'd rather find some other activities that I want to do. Or maybe at this current time I don't need to, because I am happy with something that is working. Unless I realize that lack of fat-dropping means my muscles are dropping, so maybe I'll have to do something about this soon. But there is this theory from some doctors discussing obesity that gym doesn't make you burn much calories. The body, just by existing, burns the majority of calories. I think for the internal organs to work and to maintain body temperature. Other say that if you spend too much energy on the gym, the body will say "Hey, you are not feeding me enough" and get you again into lower metabolic rate (or maybe you just want to either eat more food or go to sleep after coming back from gym). I don't know enough about it and many people will disagree and be angry about these (ahh these lazy obese people, our society gets worse). But it didn't worked with me so far and I quit (if something doesn't work, no positive motivation/feedback cycle). In case you say that I didn't go to the gym very frequently or I preferred cardio to weights or the opposite, there was a time where I went for at least two months in the gym with my brother, almost daily, doing one and a half hour program of both cardio and weights (I did hurt my muscles the first days) and all I was thinking at the time was "Fuck! If I am doing it so heavy for such a long time, I must finally see results, even if they come after the first few weeks". And it fucking didn't work! Maybe I yo-yo'ed a bit but no steady results. I don't remember my eating habits at the time, but I don't think they changed much (so I wasn't overeating as an excuse because of the gym). Of course one would think I should do both diet and gym, but that hits me already in the willpower balls, I usually have the problem to motivate me start with one of the too, how about both? And since I believe more on solving the problem with changing eating habits rather than gym, and it starts to be proven with fasting, I just quit with the gym again (I was paying empty months for nothing). Although even doctors who are not supporting gym for weight loss, say it will be fine for you but don't expect weight loss, I am not saying it's a bad thing but all I am saying is I stopped doing something when I don't feel like, even if people would argue I am not gonna lose any weight if I also don't go to the gym (or do other activities).

And thus, those are the "little" things I had to say. Of course my adventure into this new fasting strategy continues and I just need few more weeks to continue observing how it goes and hopefully everytime hoping it's not a false alarm (but I went beyond that I think). Maybe I'll do the carb-centric / scared of fat switch after my 8th week. Or maybe a bit later to keep a safe distance (I don't want changes to my plan destroy the good things I achieved here, although even if I gained weight with carb-centric, I would still learn something at least). I will keep you informed if I find something.

p.s. Forgot the links. These rather lengthy series of videos where my induction on what makes the insulin spike, how important a fasting window is to reduce the excessive insulin and how this really works with his diabetes patients.

I will never know how.

Sometimes I have this strange feeling, that if I ever manage to find ways to solve some of my chronic problems, I will never know what was the way that helped me this time despite all my previous failed attempts. It seems to me that it will be vague as my psychology, and I will not want to jump into one aspect of it and make a new religion. Most of the time, it scares me that it could be something trivial, something that will remind me how stupid I was, a solution in front of my eyes and many years wasted. Or I will try to avoid this proposition and claim it was something but I can't exactly decide what it was.

As an example, before my battle for procrastination and weight loss, there was another thing in my elementary/highschool times that was more dreadful in a way. Something that reflects my chronic sensitivity. I used to cry easily. I dreaded crying because it would make me feel so ashamed and fool of myself, yet it would happen and the more I struggled the more I couldn't stop it. It would happen in the class, in the family, with friends, everywhere. Sometimes someone would say something he/she wasn't meaning and it would make my cry. It wasn't instant, it was like a dreadful feeling that something open a shower of emotions on me and I am about to start to cry, while I struggle to not let it flood. The idea of it was making me crazy. How can I avoid it in future social situations? That could be destroying my life! It just happens, I can't control it. Here is a vital thing, a vital flow in myself that somehow I can't control when it happens and I can't predict sometimes when it will occur. Something someone said that I never expected, a very emotionally stressful day, many bad emotions accumulating, it could flood at any moment. And the more you actually struggle to fight it, the more you bring it up.

I remember this flaw. And I remember that at specific moments I was deciding to try to think more about it and wonder what I can do to eliminate it. But I never found an answer. And I never even thought of some methods. But one day.... it disappeared!

I don't remember that day, I just remember that after some period, maybe after highschool, I just stopped crying. Hell, I couldn't even make myself cry in purpose! It just shut down! Only in very rare emotional moments I cried again (so it hasn't exactly gone) but it can't just pop up anymore by something someone said (anger or other emotional responses pop up, but not crying). So, here you have it. Imagine if you worry about procrastination or weight loss or whatever and you have tried everything and nothing works. Later in another period of your life you realize that you are just losing weight or you work on projects like a robot like procrastination was never a part of your life. (Ok, I have a theory about stopping crying. Maybe by the years I learned to expect the worse outcome, so no bad surprises will shatter my world. Although that makes me like a worst-prophecy automaton, but I think I prefer it)

Now the situation is different. For some reasons I almost know, I think I am solving my weight loss problem. Maybe it's too early to talk about. I know that my weight loss problem is not just a technical matter (calories in - calories out (actually I want to stretch that there is more than this simplistic view but that's a post for another day)) but also a psychological one. I would wish I was able to follow a diet without someone pointing a gun to my head and tell me what I am allowed to eat. If I was a robot, any diet would work in the long run.

So, for another time, being disappointed at myself, already telling to myself that I don't want to follow any diets anymore, somehow I view some more videos enlightening me into more I didn't know about how the body works. And I just followed a different strategic plan inspired by the new fasting fad. I am not even doing it correctly or very precisely. It was just a decision of let's try something different and see what happens. While there was an underlying stuborness telling me "I can't take this anymore. I want something that works and maybe I can follow in the long run!". Maybe it wouldn't be fasting but something else if I had the same determination? I don't know. Because it also asks from yourself to not eat for a long window of time, and there is the initial reaction "Me, not eat? No way!". And I also believed it's just another fad I'll stick for 1-2 weeks and then get bored of it.

But I don't understand why I still going on with it. I don't understand why my WiiFit board shows a steadily 0.5kg drop per week since at least 7 weeks while all my previous attempts for 2 years where yo yo dieting. You just see a random diagram around a close range for 2 years and then a steady straight line down. Of course it's too early to tell if this works in the long run, but I was never able to persuade myself before to not always eat the tasty things, restrict myself a bit or skip a meal or two. Can you say that fasting diets are easier to follow up? I am not even doing a proper fasting diets. When I fasted for 24 hours one day, it was because me and my friends ate a whole pizza each which I calculated roughly to 2400 calories, meaning my daily intake. So I said to myself "2400 cals and you are hungry next in the morning? Fuck off!". I don't even do it correctly and it works. But why? And especially how? How did I manage to persuade myself? Or is it an easier diet to follow?

I have reasons to be skeptical about my own success. Everybody is obsessed about healthy eating on the internet these days. That pisses me off. They act like their own "truth" about healthy eating and weight loss is what everyone should do. No matter if it's traditional, vegan, low carb/high fat or any other thing. People are fighting and people are so certain. So, I don't want after my ten failures to come now and say "Hey, you know what? Low carb was not the holy grail. Fasting is the holy grail!". First of all I am still not really sure what happens in my body and how different diets affect people differently. Secondly, by doing fasting, you are effectively teach yourself to eat less or don't get touchy in one evening's lack of food (it's not like food will not be for you there tomorrow). So effectively you are restricting calories, the proponent of calories in/out would say. The vegan would say that I eat less meat when I eat less. Or I eat less carb if I learn to eat less. So all three could be true (even though I kinda combined a more preference for egg/meat/cheese while doing the fasting, so more fat-centric).

The other reason I can't say what worked is that it's not just the science (but I would like to talk about fasting and beyond that in pure technical sense). But how we get there? How we persuaded ourselves to work for this? What did I do this time to persuade myself to go on with this for more than two weeks? Did the fact that I started seeing results help? Yes it seems to be so. Did some more understanding behind the problem and science behind fasting and how it helps people with insulin resistance (which is really my problem) made me believe more into this diet? It definitely did. But maybe at my n-th attempt these all synced together, reading something new about insulin resistance and this new fasting fad, deciding to stubbornly take the test and keep on, having finally more controllable and predictable results (even my blood sugar level is on average quite lower than before) which feeds positively the belief/motivation cycle brought me in today? Or maybe I could have had the same results by "believing" in vegan diet or low-carb diet or traditional calorie restriction diets, while being stubborn and have a good 2 week luck with weight loss that would still feed the positive feedback/motivation cycle? Is it a matter of chance and stronger will? And why now? Why not before, with any diet?

Although I do believe there is something on fasting that helps more on my goals and the science behind it really resonates with my diabetes type 2 condition, I will never be sure what works "miracles" (And nothing is, I still have to police myself to not overeat after a fasting period. And most of the times I do a skip-breakfast or lunch fasting, not full blown 24 hours) and if this information would ever help people with similar obesity problem, or they also have to take it and happen to sync with a grand new attempt at finally following a specific diet. I might know what may work for me, yet not knowing how I followed more religiously this time (did I? I still do some bad eating habits after my fasting, if you examined them you'd find a lot of no-no, but overall I am dropping), but don't know how I ended up here or how I would make other people who never beat their obesity follow in my steps. Hell, I don't even know if this is a false alarm, just 7 weeks and 4 steady kg lost but something I can follow and predict. I have to wait more though, the good thing is I want to keep the fuck you.

And that's where I came into another conclusion today. Finally, one other aspect of my life I never managed to control seems controllable now. This time it didn't disappeared randomly (like crying) but after reading a lot on the subjects and making yet another attempt with a new diet strategy and more belief/positive motivation and results I entered a good flow. I still need to monitor as I want to learn more about it (maybe there will be bumps). This time, both with knowledge and positive motivation I am succeeding with it. I find knowledge/wisdom very important, but I am usually missing the willpower (if that thing exists).

So, my other thought was: What if I could achieve something similar about procrastination? What if I am missing something in the knowledge domain or have to create a positive feedback loop with new strategic means never tried before so that I don't have to pressure much myself (or I can make myself believe I am not pressuring) to do things that I dream about but doesn't feel like at the particular moment? Since I always felt the same about weight loss, not being able to control it and actually stick to a particular diet that works, persuade me to skip some lovely foods or whole meals sometimes, but suddenly the "impossible" happened, succeeding in that aspect so far without much thinking about it or disliking it. Wouldn't there be a way to do the same for procrastination? What parallels could I draw between my weight loss struggles and the procrastination struggles?

This will be my next focus. I don't even know if I will ever solve it. And if I do, I won't even know how I did solve it or how I persuaded myself to change habits. And how to pass this knowledge to other people who suffer from this and whether there needs to be more than this knowledge in their psyche for this to work, whether just passing my tricks is not gonna make other people improve. Well, maybe my own improvement might be temporary and I would fall back into old habits, who knows? These problems are not as trivial as many people want to think..

p.s. And who needs fighting procrastination anyway? It used to be the case when you had to finish your projects for the university. I now have a 9-5 job where I don't need to fight procrastination because when I am there I just sit down and work, because that's what you are supposed to do on a job. But coming back at home tired, thinking about demos I could program, yet I just want to relax and I am not paid anymore for these works, neither do I seek any recognition for hobby projects anymore (or I don't feel like I need that kind of recognition so badly (but hearing someone liking your project is still nice)) so while I have ideas there is no need to. Or is it? Well,. while I also consider procrastination a natural state (more thoughts on this later), there is a recent project I have in mind since last year (it was a new year's resolution project and 2015 is finishing soon, the irony :) and I decided that if I want to make this true then I have to find the ways to not procrastinate with it, maybe divert away from my demoscene activities, and focus into this one thing.

p.p.s. Yeah too big for a ps. Last things I worked recently was a new OpenGL engine called Quinine Engine (it will help me in other projects too, even this big one), then I started for some reason working on CPC Wolfenstein engine (I was planning something for a competition in October but I doubt I can make in time) and this new project which I really have to focus on. It is programming/demoscene relevant but not about demomaking or programming a specific app but rather something else. I dream about it and it resonates with my personality. I don't even know if I can start it by the end of this year. First, let's solve the procrastination problem.

p.p.p.s. I may arrive with more posts about weight/fasting and procrastination. Also other things I realized about life recently.

Tuesday, November 04, 2014

I have missed this feeling.

That nightly feeling (nightly, does this word exist? Sounds cute though). Getting absorbed into writing thoughts that matter in the darkness of my room (or an internet cafe, lol), while the same depressive music is playing all over again and again (I was strangely listening to some ebm remix of creep).

It flows nicely at the end, you reread what you wrote and the flow seems generally good in your mind (something I miss in many of my harsh written post), saying exactly what you wanted to say with great bitter justice.

Even if it gets big, you end up the night with some feeling of fulfilment. Instead of gaming or coding (I wish I did the second more frequently though), you have expressed some feelings the best way you could, hoping someone might be reading. A person with similar feelings, the same sensitivities, thinking "Wow! Someone said exactly what I was feeling and better than I would. More like this please!". Maybe the idea makes me not to feel alone. Someone else is happy he is like minded. I get the same feeling when I read specific posts.

One of my favorite pieces at Computer Hermit, even if long there are many places which I enjoy rereading. It seems like a subject that could partially also belong to this blog. Having to do with social norms and our misconception of what means to be a geek.

What is a geek? An imagined reality.

Monday, October 27, 2014

Triangle of my life

I just thought about this, even just for fun. I am into gaming cycle for weeks maybe (especially with Borderlands the Pre-Sequel and maybe a little bit of Legend of Grimrock 2). I do, everyday, want to return back to other things, either creative stuff or taking care of other parts of my life.

So, I thought of a triangle. Each corner has one period of activity.
- Gaming
- Creative (programming for me)
- Personal Development (from reading books or infos on psychology or philosophical things or forums to do some other stuff like trying yet another time a diet or going to gym or finding a new activity)

I am in my gaming cycle and I hope to start the creative cycle soon. Afterall there are some incoming demoparties, one which I will visit, and I want to make some little things if possible. I don't know if I will escape the gaming cycle soon, but last time I was so much fed up that I wanted to make something more creative in my computer. It's natural, no matter the amazing 3d worlds and crazy fun you can have in these games, you feel empty after a while. But then I might get burned by creative stuff, like trying to reach a deadline for a demo instead of enjoying it, I might see the results and be happy I released something at a demoparty or pouet or whatever, and then I get into recollection of thoughts, like ok I did it, but what next? What am I doing with my life? Am I still bothered by some facts about me? Maybe it's time to explore myself again? And then after being fed up of not finding answers, I get back into the gaming cycle again, like disregarding everything else.

It's cool how one completes the other. Not sure though it always goes like this. Just a funny scheme (I am too lazy or too bad at drawing it). In fact, today I feel very existential, like jumping from gaming cycle to wondering about things in my life. That's why I also feel like writing this blog post. I do have plans for creative cycle though, as ReSeT demoparty is in 3 weeks (making some small CPC entry maybe, but don't expect) and I plan to visit Sillyventure demoparty in December (not even started my AtariXL project though, and I don't even know the machine, and I am too late so really don't expect!). I just have the existential kicks.

Also, each corner of the triangle is connected to both other two. So, effectively you can go from each state to any other, considering there are no rules about going only one way. I am wondering if the opposite makes sense, going from gaming to existential feeling and from there to creative.

p.s. I don't know what to do with this blog. No time or actual motivation to write in the more frequent way I used to do. Life changes. I am not anymore living at home with my parents. I have a job. I have my own home and free leasure time. Maybe I am not as depressed as I used to be. And when I did, I was lost in the night, typing my thoughts alone, being frustrated with everything (I still am though with some things and I do want to write about them but then I prefer to not waste my time). One thought is, maybe I should write small things like this. Small portions of random thoughts.

p.p.s. It's not so small but smallish. Anyway :P

p.p.p.s. I said I am lazy (is that a gene?). But there you have it, lulz

Friday, September 12, 2014

I love the dreadful feeling of deleting stuff

I love it when I make a new stuff. And delete/clean up some stuff. Even though I am not sure whether I want to keep them. Maybe they could still be a monument of something. Maybe I don't want them. In fact a lot of my posts are peculiar and might not fit my current state of mind all the times. But don't worry, I haven't deleted anything from here. What I did was adding that blog "Almost Skeptic" here again. I can't take care of many blog, thinking that I have long to update that, and all that. I might rarely have the mood to write about UFOs and stuff. In fact, lately I write less and less frequently. Different life. I return back from work and enjoy watching educational youtube videos and other stuff. Maybe there is still a little time left for creative activities. And then definitely no mood most of the times for expressing dark feelings and shit. But I do have things to say, even though they are revolving around the same things. I might want to plan a different kind of saying things. Not sure.

So, I actually deleted the "random image thread", doesn't matter much. I could have deleted "plasmafun" or merged it with "computer hermit" but it's better to be separate atm. There are tons of games and demos I would have liked to write about, but there is not even motivation or time (or I am occupied by other things and not feeling like expressing thoughts) for even this blog. Sometimes computer hermit. It's random, big, not well written and who reads it anyway (I know some of you do :).

And then I might be killing some random blogs I opened outside blogspot. Some and some tumblr and more if I can remember the password. Or just leave them. Why not leave them you'd say? Just a clean up,. copied image in, no original content.

But that feeling of deleting/cleaning up things. Sometimes dreadfully, thinking maybe I shouldn't. But uplifting, like making a new start. Hoi Hoi Hoi

Friday, August 29, 2014

Excuses against "excuses".

"Don't blame other things to excuse yourself from acting" they said.
"You are just sitting there, doing nothing other than excusing yourself. How do you expect to improve?"
"Whatever you say is just an excuse to avoid dealing with the problem."

Phrases like these are very popular in our culture. They assume something "obvious" with which I disagree. They imply that the accused person is already exerting zero energy to solve his problems and just avoids it by analysing the problem more. While, if he just stopped excusing and acted on the problem, it would be very easily solved. The guy is simply lazy and everyone in his position would solve his problems easily enough. This is so instilled in our culture that we all nod positively when someone is accused, and this really feels to the individual like we condemn him.

So, someone can follow acting on a good habit (starting a diet for example) or just staying there arguing about it. So, we have two roots, the obvious success (A) and the pitiful loser way (B). And I ask you, if it was so easy and obvious, then why would anyone ever want to choose B over A?

An "excuser" is not a person who can simply choose what is best for him but he doesn't out of stubbornness. He is a person who has a hard time with something that is simple and obvious for the rest. The first few times he tries, later he tries more, he gets dissatisfied and stops for a while, then comes again thinking he can succeed now, failing again. During all this process he tries to explain his feelings, because he really has a problem that makes it harder to achieve something that is quite easier for most of the people. The expression of his feelings are marked as excuses.

This can be dangerous. It can be dangerous for the depressed, the obese, the love-shy. It can be dangerous for people who are in numerous other conditions that are alien to me. These people are already feeling bad with some parts of their lives that don't seem to progress and usually they have very low self-esteem. Dismissing their words as excuses without second thoughts is like implying that they are lazy, liars, everyone else is just like them and they just never tried enough. Way to go killing their self-esteem more. Not only they are losers, but they are vile, trying to take advantage of the situation for their own laziness. Even if you don't imply all these accusations by phrasing this common idea, believe me this is how you make most of these people feel.

The mistake we do, is thinking we can easily put ourselves into other people's shoes. We feel that the way we act and feel is around the same way everyone does. As an example, I never liked smoking, I tried many times to taste it, and no matter how much I tried, I never understood how can people even like it so much. From my own perspective, I would be surprised that a smoker has trouble cutting it. If I was as naive as most people, I would be shouting "Come on, this is the easiest thing in the world! Just stop smoking, damn it!!!". I would then consider every one of his replies as excuses. "You are trying to avoid the simple fact, gradually reducing smoking, less addiction. Just do it, step by step! Everything else is adding unnecessary complexity, another excuse just to avoid acting.". But I am not inside his head and his body, I am not really him, I don't know how it feels and how much harder it gets. I am an external observer who maybe for various reasons (ego?) needs to say his uninformed opinion. It seems so obvious to me, when I have never been the person with the problem.

And for me, saying things like "these are just excuses" is an excuse in itself. And excuse against "excuses". And what I imply with this is that you don't really want to understand or help that person, but for other reasons you want to stick in your opinion (which is really the popular opinion), not even considering that maybe this person acts and feels in ways you would never imagine.

But ideas like the above will still remain in the collective of memes spreading around, you'd keep seeing it, and it's even hard for the individual to explain what is wrong with them because the explanation might not be able to catch up with the "common sense", thus you will overanalyse, and that overanalysation have come to really seem like "excuses" to us all. What's best for the sufferers then when they hear the same story around them? Maybe it is to keep the faith that you really try hard and surely you have struggled more than other people and nobody can deny that from you. And secondly, stick to people with similar experiences, with whom you can share mutual understanding.

One could react about the second solution, like it's a very bad suggestion for a depressed person to stick with other depressed persons. He might spit another common obvious opinion, that everyone would instantly think it's correct. This is that "You don't place the sick among the sick." or "the depressed person goes to the depressed because he hears what he likes to hear from them" or even " Opposites attract, so stick the depressed person with happy people instead". If we play by using the word "excuse", for me this is another excuse from the accusers, that the person should stop being depressed, he is lazy and prefers more company with other depressed people than "normal" persons, an excuse they use to belittle and control the sufferer. Really, if your regular environment (family, friends, school, who most of them don't (want to) understand your problem) is tha majority of your encounters, how does this cure your problem, instead of making you more miserable, hearing everyone saying how much you excuse yourself, how easily it would have been to solve your problems, how much a loser you are and just blame others for your problems. Afterall that's how you lost yourself, being born and living for most of your life around people compared to whom you are kinda different and being blamed by the same environment for so long.

My final theory is that there is no perfectly defined normal, no absolutely good or bad, but what happens is that you might be the unlucky to have been born in an era where you differ drastically from the majority around you, in aspects that make things a pain for you and non-affected people easily criticizing you. So, what's best other than trusting your instincts and stick to the persons who understand you? Maybe the better environment will cure your lost self-esteem and help you improve your life in the aspects you want to improve. And even if you don't, you might learn to come in terms in yourself and accept who you are.

We must learn to ignore the tyranny of excuses blaming.
Locations of visitors to this page